Printable Version
Go Back
Preparing Vulnerable Populations for Catastrophic Public Health Emergencies
Monday, August 27, 2007
(Michael Greenberger) --
It goes without saying that preparing for
catastrophic emergencies requires careful
planning, coordination and
implementation. However, when developing
emergency plans, it is especially important
that policymakers keep the special needs of
vulnerable populations in
mind.
Vulnerable populations include
inner-city and low-income communities, as well
as, the physically/mentally disabled, limited
English or non-English speakers, the
elderly/frail, children, and the
homeless. These groups frequently do not
have access to general resources that
government and private care providers assume
are available in the event of a natural
disaster or a terrorist threat. For
example, vulnerable populations often do not
have access to private and/or adequate
transportation for evacuation, surplus food and
water, medical supplies, medical care, or
appropriate and safe shelter during an
emergency.
The Hurricane Katrina
experience offers a grim example of the deadly
consequences a catastrophe can wreak on
vulnerable populations, who are poorly prepared
for emergencies. The hurricane flooded
approximately 80% of New Orleans, killed an
estimated 1,527 residents in the New Orleans
metropolitan area, and displaced 770,000
others. Nearly 100,000 inner-city New
Orleans residents could not evacuate, because
they lacked the means to do so.
Many residents who could not afford to shoulder
the costs of lodging, food, and transportation
took shelter at the Superdome, a designated
“special-needs shelter,” where the
electricity and plumbing failed for roughly
20,000-30,000 individuals leading to
lawlessness and desperation. As many as
30,000 people filled the New Orleans convention
center, which was never meant to be a shelter
and had no food or water
provisions.
Patients living
in New Orleans nursing homes were especially
devastated as many of those facilities lacked
adequate evacuation plans and emergency
resources. Indeed, seventy one percent of the
victims in Louisiana were older than sixty, and
forty-seven percent of those were over
seventy-five. The hurricane also caused
nearly 2,000 foster children in Louisiana to be
displaced, disrupting their access to health
care, education and social services.
In sum, one of the key lessons of
Hurricane Katrina is that it is critical that
emergency planning include strategies for
vulnerable populations; however, the federal
post- mortems on Hurricane Katrina illustrate a
distanced and vague approach towards this
issue.
For example, the Bush
Administration’s report about Katrina, The
Federal Response to Hurricane Katrina: Lessons
Learned, offered only the most highly
generalized support and guidance for emergency
preparedness efforts addressed to vulnerable
populations. Of the 125 recommendations
in the report, only about 8 are arguably
applicable to improving vulnerable population
emergency preparedness efforts, and these 8
recommendations deal with community
preparedness in a general way. Moreover,
the federal government must focus on the other
117 recommendations that bear no relationship
to vulnerable populations’ preparedness in
order to strengthen the federal response.
Without further funding or specific direction
from the federal government, state and local
governments alone, with their severe budget and
resource constraints, cannot be expected to
support these kinds of preparedness
initiatives.
For this reason, it
is critical that stakeholders at all levels,
both public and private, work in unison to
ensure that vulnerable populations are prepared
for the next disaster. Among the appropriate
stakeholders are: government agencies and
officials at the federal, state, and local
level; community organizations; academic
leaders and scholars; physicians; nurses;
social workers; lawyers; emergency responders;
religious leaders; and charitable
institutions. These groups must take the
lead and work together to establish
cost-effective pilot programs that incorporate
all the necessary components to ensure that
vulnerable populations are prepared for a
catastrophe, such as notification procedures,
access to emergency supplies and information on
evacuation and shelters. These programs
should help families prepare a “go” kit
that contains vital records and supplies in the
event that evacuation is necessary. Once
a pilot program has been created, implemented
and tested in a particular community, it can
then be used as a template for the development
of similar models for other communities
throughout the nation.
The University of
Maryland Center for Health and Homeland
Security is helping initiate stakeholder
interactions and cooperation by hosting a
conference, Vulnerable Populations:
Emergency Planning, to discuss the challenges
associated with preparing vulnerable
populations for emergency situations. The
conference is funded by the McCormick Tribune
Foundation and will take place on November 5-7,
2007. The key goals and follow-up
activities of the conference include: (1)
establishing partnerships among the key
stakeholders, including representative
community leaders, federal, state and local
government officials, emergency preparedness
planners, private charities, and public health
practitioners; (2) organization and stimulation
of literature, curricula, and plans relating to
this subject; (3) developing a national action
plan to address the problem of vulnerable
populations in catastrophic emergencies; and
(4) stimulating interest and private funding in
establishing pilot projects using the
recommendations from the conference that would
undertake emergency planning efforts in
carefully selected local constituencies with
the idea of developing templates of response to
be developed nationally.
For more
information on the conference and regarding
emergency planning for vulnerable populations,
visit the conference Web site at http://www.umaryland.edu/healthsecurity/mtf_conference/index.html#background.